Provident Investment Management
books.jpg

News & Insights

 
Posts in Investments
September Investment Comments

Uncertainty makes people uncomfortable, and there is plenty of uncertainty to go around. The virus continues to stubbornly stick around; we don’t know how widely it will spread if schools and colleges are opened to in-person learning; we don’t know if one or more vaccines will be effective; and then there is an election this fall in case you haven’t heard.

It is said, “The market runs from uncertainty.” Yet the S&P 500 and NASDAQ indexes just reached all-time records. The Dow Jones Industrials Average is about 5% below its all-time high while the Russell 2000 index of small stocks is 8% below its high. Stock indexes at all-time highs don’t sound like a market running from uncertainty!

Read More
August Investment Comments

“If you see that kind of disconnect, it doesn’t go on indefinitely. Those normally will get reconciled, and this will too.”

These were the words of Federal Reserve Board Bank of Dallas President Robert Kaplan when interviewed by CNBC on July 13th. He was referring to the disconnect between the financial markets, with an upbeat view of the future, and the performance of the economy, which remains under stress. The question for investors, of course, is will the markets move towards the economy or the economy towards the markets?

Read More
July Investment Comments

The U.S. has officially tipped into recession, defined as two straight quarters of negative economic growth. Q1 GDP contracted at a 5% annualized rate. Q2 will feel the full brunt of lockdown. Trading Economics reports consensus Q2 GDP growth estimates as -17%. Continuing jobless claims are hovering in the 21 million range, more than ten times their pre-pandemic level. Supplementary unemployment benefits of $600 per week are scheduled to cease at the end of July, unless lawmakers negotiate some kind of modified extension. It won’t be easy to spur a broad-based return to work. The jobs have to be there, and people have to be incentivized to accept them.

The stock market, meanwhile, is anticipating a robust recovery. After a jarring 35% March plunge, the market’s subsequent recovery has been just as stunning. The S&P 500 is currently down just 4% on the year. The Nasdaq 100, burgeoning with beloved, recession-resistant software companies, is up 13%. Japan’s Nikkei 225 has performed similarly to the S&P. European stock averages have been a little weaker, mostly down low-double digits so far this year. Valuations were not exactly cheap before the pandemic started. So what happens next?

Read More
June Investment Comments

After a dizzying late February and March that saw the stock market fall into bear market territory (down 20% or more) at the fastest pace in history, the recovery from the S&P 500’s low of 2,237 on March 23rd has been almost as breathtaking, a roughly 30% advance. For 2020 the index is down about 10% for the year, substantially better than might be expected given the health and economic damage inflicted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Recent statistics on the health impact of the virus are daunting. Johns Hopkins’s COVID-19 dashboard reports over 4.2 million cases worldwide and approximately 290,000 deaths. The U.S. alone now has over 1.35 million cases and approximately 81,000 deaths, 27,000 of which have occurred in New York State. The human toll COVID-19 has wrought is tragic.

Read More
May Investment Comments

The S&P 500 followed up its more than 30% total return in 2019 with a decline of 20% in the first quarter of 2020. That understates the severity of the move, as small- and mid- cap stocks were down 30%, and at its lows the S&P 500 was 35% off its recent peak. In March, the S&P 500 moved an average of 5% per day, the most of any month on record.

Nobody is certain about the extent of the damage done to the economy as a result of efforts to combat COVID-19. We do know that there has been a severe demand shock that will result in a sharp economic contraction and a meaningful decline in corporate earnings. In response to these concerns, the Federal Reserve Board, Administration, and Congress moved to support workers and businesses with programs to preserve as much of the economy as possible while large portions of the country are shut down.

Read More
April Investment Comments

We are all concerned about the potential impact of the coronavirus outbreak on our families and friends, particularly those who are elderly or who are already dealing with other medical issues. We hope you are well and urge everyone to exercise appropriate caution. Although it is uncomfortable to lose our social avenues, we hope the closing of public facilities will severely limit the opportunity for this virus to spread further.

Investment Comments typically focuses on economic and market developments, and the outlook. Recent economic statistics primarily reflect the pre-coronavirus economy, which is now a matter of historical record rather than an indicator of where we are headed. The economy has clearly taken a hit—we can see it with our eyes, and the market movement has confirmed it.

Read More
March Investment Comments

In January, after spending much of two years wrestling with trade issues, the U.S. signed two important pieces of legislation. The first, and likely more important, is the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, an update to NAFTA covering trade rules for North America. The second was a “Phase 1” agreement with China that reduced the likelihood of further tariff escalation and laid out a negotiating timeline to work through difficult discussions such as protection of intellectual property. The markets breathed a sigh of relief and began to rally on the thinking that businesses could now rely on (relative) certainty of trade and tariffs to support long-term product sourcing decisions.

Then along came the coronavirus (COVID-19). According to the World Health Organization, as of February 18, the virus has sickened more than 73,000 and killed 1,853. With most of these cases concentrated in the country of origin, China, the world has responded with various degrees of isolation. More than 30 airlines have suspended service to China and a 78-nation matrix of rules and quarantines from the U.S. to Singapore have all but banned Chinese travelers from foreign soil.

Read More
February Investment Comments

The S&P 500 produced a total return of 31.5% in 2019.  That huge advance is particularly astonishing considering that aggregate corporate earnings barely grew at all.  According to the 1/10/20 edition of FactSet Earnings Insight by John Butters, analysts expect full-year 2019 earnings to average a meager 0.2% growth with revenue growth of 3.9%.  Roughly speaking, this means the year’s entire rally is currently manifested in higher P/E multiples.  We can think of some reasons why the current investment climate supports higher valuations than the climate of just 12 months ago, but 31.5%? That is a lot to explain.

For starters, those modest corporate growth numbers are a bit of a red herring, weighed down by low energy prices and industrial sector softness that will probably turn out to be temporary.  More on this below.  Overall, the U.S. economy remains on solid footing.  Measured unemployment is holding steady at 3.5%. Normal wage growth is running at approximately 3%, fairly strong.

Read More
January Investment Comments

This has been a very good year for investors, with the S&P 500 on pace for its strongest year since 2013.  Total returns including dividends through November stood at more than 27%.  The headline number is aided by 2018’s lackluster performance, which was the S&P’s first decline in a decade despite posting 20% earnings growth.  Earnings in 2019 appear headed for low single-digit growth, and early projections for 2020 are for a near double-digit advance.  The forward P/E multiple is approximately 17.5x, above the 5-year average though lower interest rates support the case for a higher-than-average multiple.  Yields on 10-year Treasury bonds started the year at 2.6% but more recently were closer to 1.8%.

Despite concerns about slowing global growth, which have been reflected in modest business investment and a contraction in manufacturing activity, the economic backdrop looks generally favorable.  GDP growth in 2019 should be in the neighborhood of 2%, consistent with expectations for 2020.  This isn’t particularly inspiring, but it could certainly be worse. 

Read More
December Investment Comments

As we look toward year-end, global stock markets have had a remarkable year despite tepid growth outside the U.S.

Stock markets in the U.S., Japan, and Germany are up greater than 20%.  China’s index has also risen by more than 20%, but remains well below its springtime high for 2019 and far behind its record high from early 2018.  Canada’s major index gained 15% so far this year.  Even the U.K. is up in the high-single digits despite all the commotion surrounding Brexit.  These returns are in local currency.  Therefore, U.S. investors in overseas markets have experienced lower returns because of the strength of the dollar versus other currencies.

U.S. economic growth is hovering around 2%, down from 2.9% for 2018 but well above other developed economies.  Europe experienced 0.8% growth in both the second and third quarters even as certain key economies are flirting with recession.  GDP growth in Canada and Japan is running at 1.3% with the caveat that an October 1st sales tax increase in Japan will likely lead to weak economic conditions judging from reactions to past tax increases.  Growth in India was 5%, but trends appear to be slowing.  In China, 6% GDP growth was the slowest in 27 years.  Anecdotal reports from companies doing business in China paint an even less optimistic portrait of economic conditions there.

Read More
October Investment Comments

From listening to the media, it is hard to believe the market is again flirting with all-time highs.  An “inverted” yield curve, trade policy uncertainties, overseas economic weakness, and always-present political instabilities, such as the recent attack on Saudi Arabian oilfields, should surely be enough to make anyone run for cover.

 But these concerns don’t seem to be holding back equity investors.  The forward 12-month P/E ratio for the S&P 500 is 16.8, just slightly ahead of the 5-year average of 16.5 and about 14% above the 10-year average of 14.8, a period that includes very weak earnings from 2009 and 2010.  Further, unlike a year ago, analysts aren’t expecting double-digit earnings growth.  For calendar years 2019 and 2020, earnings are expected to grow 4.3% and 5.6%, respectively.

Read More
September Investment Comments

Cautionary Signs or False Signals?

The 30-year Treasury bond recently yielded just over 2%, an all-time low.  Think about it:  investing one’s money for three decades for a negative return after taxes and inflation are factored in.  Usually long-term Treasuries perform well during periods of economic uncertainty, especially at the onset of a recession.  That’s the initial message investors perceive from this low bond yield.

 Another cautionary sign is that the Treasury yield curve is partially “inverted.”  A “normal” yield curve is upwardly-sloping, meaning that investors demand a higher yield in exchange for taking on the risks of investing over a longer period of time.  The 30-year Treasury typically yields more than the 10-year, and the 10-year more than the 2-year or a 90-day Treasury bill.  An inverted yield curve occurs when the opposite is true, that short-term Treasuries pay better than long ones.  This is rational only when the outlook is for lower interest rates as long-dated bonds will appreciate more than shorter bonds when interest rates fall.  Recently, shorter maturities like the 2-year and 5-year Treasury and the 90-day bill yielded more than a 10-year Treasury.  The 30-year bond still yields about half a percentage point more, hence the term “partial inversion.”

Read More
August Investment Comments

A famous investor once said, “Most of the time the Fed is not that important; occasionally it’s the only game in town.”  While the Fed is not the only thing that matters in the current environment—trade, for one, is another notable factor driving markets—one could certainly make a reasonable case that it has been the primary influence on market performance since the back half of 2018.  Last year, markets sold off following the Fed’s September 2018 meeting when, for the eighth time since 2015, it increased its target overnight lending rate and no longer referred to its own monetary policy as “accommodative.”  Subsequent to that meeting, Chairman Jerome Powell also stated his belief that the Fed was still a “long way from neutral” (i.e., rates that are neither stimulative nor contractionary), implying several more rate hikes were on the way and sending markets lower.

 In December, the Fed again increased rates while also signaling two rate hikes for 2019.  This was more aggressive than the market was anticipating, particularly in light of global economic uncertainty and ongoing trade disputes.  In response, markets took another leg down, declining a total of nearly 20% between the end of September and the Christmas Eve low.  For the year, the S&P 500 fell 4.4% despite earnings growth of approximately 20%.

Read More
July Investment Comments

After ten years of mostly steady expansion, the industrial economy currently looks tired.  Transportation, energy, and basic materials stocks have been among the market’s worst performers in the past one and three months.  The statistics confirm investors’ concerns.  April’s industrial production estimate showed annualized growth of less than 1%, about half its previous pace.  In May, the manufacturing Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) logged its worst monthly reading since 2009.  Statistics are noisy estimators, but it would be nearly impossible to generate data that bad purely by chance.

 Yet non-industrial indicators continue to hold up.  Retail sales and consumer spending are advancing steadily.  Consumer confidence, surveyed by the University of Michigan, remains strong. Measured unemployment is just 3.6%.  A slowdown in the economy’s industrial “engine” would have signaled a wider recession historically, but the industrial cycle just doesn’t seem to matter like it once did.  The American worker and consumer is doing just fine thanks, steel or no steel.

Read More
June Investment Comments

After the market hit all-time highs in late April, May marked the return of volatility as trade negotiations with China broke down.

 It all started on Sunday, May 5th when President Trump issued a tweet indicating the Chinese had backtracked on already-negotiated promises to write into Chinese law changes covering areas like intellectual property, subsidies, and forced technology transfers.  China wanted to issue regulations to support these changes, but in the past regulations haven’t been enough to change behavior.  In response, Mr. Trump chose to increase existing tariffs on approximately $200 billion of Chinese goods from 10% to 25% starting June 1st.

 It appears the reason for China’s change in position stems from misinterpretation of various comments from the President as well as internal Chinese politics.  Mr. Trump has called for interest rate cuts from the Federal Reserve, a request that usually indicates economic weakness.  Public comments that trade negotiations were going well and belief that an agreement was imminent gave China the impression that Mr. Trump had to make a deal.  Further, hard-liners within the Communist Party resistant to market reform expressed their displeasure at the proposed trade agreement.

Read More
May Investment Comments

After a strong start to 2019, markets have recovered from the significant declines experienced in last year’s fourth quarter.  Much of the rebound can be attributed to the relatively abrupt pivot by the Federal Reserve at the start of the year to be patient with further rate increases, versus a prior indication of multiple expected rate hikes in 2019.  At its most recent meeting in March, the Federal Reserve went a step further by indicating it no longer anticipates raising rates at all this year, while also pulling back on plans to shrink its balance sheet.  These moves were well-received by the market, which was somewhat perplexed by the Fed’s prior bias toward raising rates in what looked to be an environment of slowing global growth and well-contained inflation.

The U.S. economy is expected to grow in 2019, but at a slower rate than the 2.9% growth posted a year ago.  The Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow estimates Q1 growth of 2.3% and consensus expectations for full year GDP growth are closer to 2.0%.  This slowdown isn’t necessarily cause for alarm, as the data point to an environment that remains positive.

Read More
April Investment Comments

“With our policy rate in the range of neutral, with muted inflation pressures and with some of the downside risks we’ve talked about, this is a good time to be patient,” according to Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell.  Comforting statements like this have helped restore investor confidence just as Powell’s confusing statements last year may have triggered the fourth quarter market stampede.  It is not unusual for new Fed Chairpeople to get their messaging wrong at first.

 At this point last year, investors were concerned about rising inflation and higher interest rates.  Fast forward twelve months and it appears that we might be in that fabled Goldilocks economy – not too hot, not too cold.

 U.S. economic growth in 2018 was the highest since before the Great Recession.  The current year is likely to be lower due to sluggishness outside the U.S. and the lack of incremental stimulus from tax cuts and extra government spending last year.  Some economists peg growth below 2% while many have it in the mid 2’s for 2019.

Read More
March Investment Comments

So far, 2019 has been kinder to investors than was the finish to 2018.  A combination of stronger-than-expected earnings, a more accommodative Federal Reserve, and a strong labor market has supported the full recovery from December’s 9% loss for the S&P 500.

On the earnings front, results are coming in better than expected.  According to FactSet Earnings Insight authored by John Butters, fourth quarter 2018 earnings are projected to grow 13.3% for firms that make up the S&P 500 index.  This is a fairly solid reading as 66% of companies have already reported.  If this earnings growth rate holds it will mark the fifth consecutive quarter of double-digit earnings growth for the index.

Read More
February Investment Comments

Volatility returned to the stock market in 2018, ending the gentle melt up that investors had enjoyed.  The S&P 500 dropped at least 10% in three separate months last year—February, October, and December.  Stocks battled back bravely from the first two corrections, but a weak December finally torpedoed the S&P’s 2018 performance.  After a -9% showing in the final month, the index ended the year down 4.4%, breaking a nine-year streak of positive total returns.

From its September intraday peak to its December nadir, the S&P declined a hair more than 20%, the traditional line demarcating a bear market.  The index has since come back more than 10%.  If the rebound holds then we may have just experienced the shortest bear market in history, lasting only about 48 hours.  Traders sometimes speak of “purely technical” moves, and we have to say that an exactly 20% drop followed by a sharp rebound does suggest that something other than economic and business fundamentals took control of the joystick for a minute.

Read More
January Investment Comments

Investors hoping for a year-end rally have instead been treated to increased market volatility.  A near 5% decline in its first week was the market’s worst start to December since 2008, though this drop followed what was the S&P 500’s best week in almost seven years.  The recent turbulence is reflective of an environment where both market bulls and bears have valid arguments to support their stance.

Topping the list of current concerns is the U.S.-Chinese trade dispute.  The market initially celebrated what appeared to be a positive meeting between President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping following the G20 summit.  This meeting resulted in a 90-day postponement in tariffs on $200 billion in Chinese imports that were expected to jump from 10% to 25% at the start of the year.  However, the initial positive interpretation of the meeting was subsequently brought into question given reports of “significant differences” in the two governments’ versions of what was agreed upon at the dinner.  Markets also did not respond favorably to President Trump’s tweet days after the meeting proclaiming himself a “Tariff Man.”

Read More